The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal recently issued an order regarding the dispute between Vikram Kapoor, the appellant, and M/s Man Realty Ltd. & Anr., the respondents. The case centers around a tripartite agreement wherein both the appellant and respondent no.1 are jointly and severally liable to pay EMI to respondent no.2. The issue at hand is whether the respondent no.1 paid the EMI to respondent no.2 before handing over possession of the subject flat to the allottee.
During the hearing, the appellant's lawyer, Mr. Minil Shah, requested a paginated copy of the reply to a temporary injunction (Misc. Application No.55 of 2022) filed by the respondents' lawyer, Ms. Nisha Mehra. The court ordered that the respondent recover further EMI from the respondent no.1 until the completion of the pleadings in Misc. Application No.55 of 2022. The case was adjourned to June 12, 2023, for the filing of a reply to Misc. Application No.55 of 2022 and a hearing on the same.
The order has significant implications for both parties involved in the case. This article will provide an in-depth analysis of the ruling and its potential impact on the real estate industry in Maharashtra.
Background of the Case
The dispute between Kapoor and Man Realty Ltd. & Anr. revolves around a tripartite agreement. A tripartite agreement is a legal document that involves three parties, outlining the terms and conditions of the arrangement between them. In this case, the agreement was between the appellant, the respondents, and the financier of the property.
The agreement stated that both the appellant and respondent no.1 were jointly and severally liable to pay EMI to respondent no.2. The EMI was supposed to be paid before handing over possession of the subject flat to the allottee. The dispute arose when respondent no.2 claimed that they did not receive the EMI from respondent no.1 before the handover.
The Proceedings in Court
The case was brought before the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) in 2020. However, the parties failed to arrive at a settlement, and the case was transferred to the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal. The appellant filed a Miscellaneous Application (Misc. Application No.437 of 2022) seeking an amendment to the pleadings. The respondents, on the other hand, filed a temporary injunction (Misc. Application No.55 of 2022) to prevent the appellant from selling the subject flat.
During the hearing, Mr. Shah, the appellant's lawyer, requested a paginated copy of the reply to the temporary injunction filed by the respondents. Ms. Mehra, the respondents' lawyer, sought time to file the reply and undertook to serve a paginated copy of the reply to the other side. The court allowed the respondents to file their reply by June 12, 2023, and ordered further EMI recovery from respondent no.1 till the disposal of Misc. Application No.55 of 2022.
Analysis of the Order
The order has significant implications for both the parties involved in the case. The court's decision to order further EMI recovery from respondent no.1 until the disposal of Misc. Application No.55 of 2022 has put the onus on the respondent to ensure timely payment of EMI. This order ensures that the financier is not left with an unpaid loan, which is a common occurrence in the real estate industry.
In conclusion, the recent order by the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal in the Kapoor vs. Man Realty case has significant implications for the real estate sector in India. The tribunal's decision to allow further recovery of EMI from the respondent until the disposal of the temporary injunction application is a departure from the usual practice in such cases.
The decision underscores the importance of timely payments and adherence to contractual obligations, particularly in the context of the real estate sector where the stakes are high for all parties involved. It also highlights the need for transparency and accountability in real estate transactions to protect the interests of all stakeholders.
Moving forward, it is crucial for developers and buyers alike to carefully review the terms and conditions of any tripartite agreements before entering into them. The Kapoor vs. Man Realty case serves as a reminder that even seemingly minor oversights or breaches of contract can have significant legal and financial consequences.
As the real estate sector continues to evolve, it is likely that more disputes will arise, and it is imperative for stakeholders to seek timely and effective resolution through the appropriate legal channels. With the guidance of the judiciary and the support of legal experts, the industry can continue to grow and thrive while upholding the principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability.
Note: The information provided in this article about Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal or professional advice and readers should consult qualified professionals for advice specific to their circumstances.
By subscribing to AryaBot, you can receive updates on all RERA-approved projects in your desired area directly on your WhatsApp. AryaBot offers a free list of new RERA-approved real estate developments, so you can stay up-to-date on the latest developments in the area.
Know more about AryaBot at ReunionHQ
Explore the list of new RERA approved projects in Maharashtra.