Legal Dispute Settled Amicably: Neeta Dhamale and Ajit Marathe Reach Agreement

In a recent development, a legal dispute between Mrs. Neeta V. Dhamale and Mr. Ajit Marathe & Another has been settled amicably. The matter was being heard in the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai, and the parties have now reached an agreement.

The case in question was Misc. Appln. No. 496 of 2022 (Non-comp. of order) in Appeal No. AT006000000063820. Mrs. Neeta V. Dhamale was the appellant in the case, while Mr. Ajit Marathe & Another were the respondents. The matter had been ongoing for some time, but the parties have now resolved their differences and the case has been disposed of by the Tribunal.

Background of the Case

The legal dispute between Mrs. Neeta V. Dhamale and Mr. Ajit Marathe & Another arose in the context of a real estate transaction. The details of the transaction are not known, but it appears that there was a disagreement between the parties over the amount of money owed. This led to Mrs. Dhamale filing an appeal in the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.

The Tribunal is a quasi-judicial body that hears appeals against orders passed by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA). MahaRERA is a regulatory authority set up under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), which seeks to regulate the real estate sector and protect the interests of homebuyers.

The Appeal

Mrs. Neeta V. Dhamale filed an appeal in the Tribunal against an order passed by MahaRERA. The order in question is not known, but it appears that it related to the real estate transaction between Mrs. Dhamale and Mr. Marathe & Another. The appeal was filed as Misc. Appln. No. 496 of 2022 (Non-comp. of order) in Appeal No. AT006000000063820.

The appeal was being heard by the Tribunal, and the parties had engaged the services of counsel. Mr. Avinash S. Sangurdekar was representing Mrs. Dhamale, while Mr. Makarand Raut was representing Mr. Marathe & Another.

Settlement of the Dispute

The matter was settled amicably between the parties. The details of the settlement are not known, but it appears that the Non-applicant (Mr. Marathe & Another) has paid the amount mentioned in the order, including costs and interest on the delayed payment. Mrs. Dhamale has no further grievance with Mr. Marathe & Another for any amount.

Mrs. Dhamale's counsel, upon instructions, filed a pursis seeking leave to withdraw Misc. Application No. 496 of 2022. The pursis was granted by the Tribunal, and the matter was disposed of as withdrawn, with no costs awarded.

Note: The information provided in this article about Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal or professional advice and readers should consult qualified professionals for advice specific to their circumstances.

By subscribing to AryaBot, you can receive updates on all RERA-approved projects in your desired area directly on your WhatsApp. AryaBot offers a free list of new RERA-approved real estate developments, so you can stay up-to-date on the latest developments in the area.

Know more about AryaBot at ReunionHQ

Explore the list of new RERA approved projects in Maharashtra.