Deficiency in Service: Architects Ordered to Refund Rs. 1.35 Crore and Demolish Unsafe Building

Deficiency in Service: Architects Ordered to Refund Rs. 1.35 Crore and Demolish Unsafe Building. A landmark judgment by the National Consumer Commission holds architects accountable for constructing an unsafe building. #ConsumerProtection #ArchitecturalAccountability

Deficiency in Service: Architects Ordered to Refund Rs. 1.35 Crore and Demolish Unsafe Building
Deficiency in Service: Architects Ordered to Refund Rs. 1.35 Crore and Demolish Unsafe Building

In a landmark judgment, the National Consumer Commission has ruled against an architectural firm, holding them accountable for a case of deficiency in service. The architects were found guilty of constructing an unsafe building and breaching their promises to the client. As a result, the commission has ordered the architects to refund Rs. 1.35 crore to the aggrieved party and demolish the hazardous structure. This ruling sets a significant precedent for consumer protection and emphasizes the importance of ensuring quality and safety in architectural projects.

The Promises and Expectations

The architectural firm, known for its prestigious projects, had promised the complainant a state-of-the-art building that would meet all safety standards and comply with local regulations. The complainant, a business owner, had invested a substantial amount of capital in the project, expecting a secure and functional space for their operations.

Construction Delays and Substandard Workmanship

Unfortunately, the project faced numerous delays, causing significant inconvenience to the complainant and hindering their business operations. Moreover, it was discovered that the construction workmanship was substandard, compromising the structural integrity of the building. The complainant noticed visible cracks, uneven floors, and other defects that raised serious concerns about the safety and durability of the structure.

Frustrated by the deteriorating conditions and the architects' failure to address the issues promptly, the complainant decided to take legal action. They filed a complaint with the National Consumer Commission, seeking justice and compensation for the damages suffered. The case underwent a thorough investigation to assess the validity of the claims made by the complainant.

Deficiency in Service and Breach of Promise

During the proceedings, it became evident that the architectural firm had indeed failed to deliver on their promises and obligations. The evidence presented highlighted the inadequate construction practices, lack of attention to detail, and disregard for safety measures. The complainant's investment had been met with incompetence and negligence, resulting in an unsafe building that posed a risk to both occupants and the surrounding community.

Landmark Judgment and Consumer Protection

Taking into account the severity of the situation, the National Consumer Commission issued a landmark judgment in favor of the complainant. The commission not only ordered the architects to refund the complainant Rs. 1.35 crore but also mandated the demolition of the unsafe building. This ruling demonstrates the commitment of the judicial system to protect consumers from unscrupulous practices and reinforces the principle that professionals must be held accountable for their actions.


The case of deficiency in service against the architectural firm highlights the crucial need for quality control, adherence to regulations, and ethical practices within the construction industry. The ruling by the National Consumer Commission serves as a wake-up call to architects and firms, reminding them of their responsibilities towards clients and the wider society. It is a significant victory for consumer protection and acts as a deterrent against future instances of negligence and non-compliance.

Note: Please note that the information provided in this article about the complaint filed in the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) is for educational purposes only. The complaint number for reference is CONSUMER CASE NO. 562 OF 2016

By subscribing to AryaBot, you can receive updates on all RERA-approved projects in your desired area directly on your WhatsApp. AryaBot offers a free list of new RERA-approved real estate developments, so you can stay up-to-date on the latest developments in the area.

Know more about AryaBot at ReunionHQ

Explore the list of new RERA approved projects in Maharashtra.

Mumbai Nagpur Nashik
Pune Aurangabad Satara
Thane Ahmednagar Kolhapur
Maharashtra Dombivli Palghar